Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Twilight Struggle References
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Complex/Rational 00:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of Twilight Struggle References (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is no indication of list notability for this. I suggested merging to Twilight Struggle, but the editors at the talk page there do not seem to feel there is anything worth salvaging. Courtesy pinging participants CohenTheBohemian, Literally_Satan, and VQuakr. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games, History, and Lists. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I find the list mildly interesting, but this is something that should be on Fandom or something of that nature. It's over-detailed for an encyclopedia. VQuakr (talk) 21:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Strong delete. Trivial WP:FANCRUFT to the nth degree. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:39, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as fancruft. Thanks for the ping. CohenTheBohemian (talk) 02:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete No independent sources, doesnt pass WP:GNG, could potentailly be considered promotional Questions? four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - The very definition of non-notable trivia. I concur with the editors on the talk page that the material here would not be appropriate for merging. Rorshacma (talk) 05:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Poor quality violation of WP:NOTTVTROPES. Fails WP:NLIST/WP:GNG/etc. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- obviously delete fancruft. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 01:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete WP:LISTN Lightburst (talk) 13:55, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.