Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Adrian Ridner
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. (non-admin closure) — Godsy (TALKCONT) 02:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
no notability exceptthrough the company--most of the references deal with the firm,not with him. DGG ( talk ) 09:52, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- It seems innocuous as long as Study.com is an article. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:54, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- innocuous is now the atandard.? DGG ( talk ) 09:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- Innocuous? It means I wonder why it draws your attention. Also, we don’t delete drafts due to notability concerns, and “most of the references” implies “some” might deal with him. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:03, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- innocuous is now the atandard.? DGG ( talk ) 09:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NMFD. Happy to reconsider if there are other concerns. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:55, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We don’t need to delete for lack of notability in draftspace, unless there are other issues present. SK2242 (talk) 07:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- OK< I'm withdrawing this. --I'm not sure why I bothered. DGG ( talk ) 02:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.