Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Gaylor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus to delete, agreement on whether the subject is notable or not couldn't be reached. (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 21:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Brett Gaylor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unreferenced autobiography that fails WP:BIO. --DAJF (talk) 13:18, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —DAJF (talk) 13:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —DAJF (talk) 13:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak deleteI have expanded the article and added four references[1] but despite the modest amount of coverage he has received he is still an indie director with no notable films. (To closing admins: if this is still the only vote when it comes time to close it please re-list, more discussion is needed). -IcĕwedgЁ (ťalķ) 22:10, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the addition of even more sources by Paul Erik. -IcĕwedgЁ (ťalķ) 05:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – I've also now added several references: articles in The Gazette, Variety, Playback, and the Montreal Mirror. None are exclusively about Gaylor, but they are all non-trivial mentions, likely enough for the "basic criteria" of WP:BIO. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 23:26, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment since its frowned on to add stuff about oneself, re: "notable films" - http://www.nfb.ca/collection/films/fiche/?id=51284&v=h&lg=en
I am also on the executive of the Quebec chapter of the Documentary Organization of Canada.
http://www.docquebec.ca/executive/#brett
- BG —Preceding unsigned comment added by Etherworks (talk • contribs) 13:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - how does an article on Lessig act as a source for this article? --T-rex 01:38, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The article (from the San Francisco Chronicle) mentions Gaylor's film The Basement Tapes, has a quote from Gaylor, and verifies that Gaylor is from Montreal. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:02, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 10:41, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - just about sufficient media coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 10:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Reliable sources have been posted that show this guy isn't "the average Joe", so I have no concerns with keeping this article. If an article doesn't fail any policies, and the subject has some notability, I believe we should keep it.--SJP (talk) 12:58, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete. Referring to WP:CREATIVE, I don't believe Mr. Gaylord has yet achieved any of the criteria. The closest would appear to be "(c) has won significant critical attention" for which it may be argued that his win at Banff in 2005 would suffice, but I am not convinced that it does. PKT (talk) 16:52, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.